4 diciembre , 2023

Technologies and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these systems. Out of lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the border to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being found in asylum applications. This article is exploring www.ascella-llc.com/counseling-services-for-students/ how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with capricious tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to navigate these systems and to follow their right for cover.

It also demonstrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering them from accessing the channels of safeguards. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of those technologies, through which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects who all are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these technologies have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double result: although they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also help to make it difficult designed for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions manufactured by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.

COMPARTE: